tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8885167082319491081.post648607880700068984..comments2008-09-08T20:10:14.643-04:00nickghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04659163622120256748noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8885167082319491081.post-8693556663257260592008-09-08T12:55:00.000-04:002008-09-08T12:55:00.000-04:002008-09-08T12:55:00.000-04:00many more ways to do it here with some benchmarks in the comments:<BR/><BR/>http://coreygoldberg.blogspot.com/2008/06/python-sort-dictionary-by-values.htmlCorey Goldberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06219872951977664560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8885167082319491081.post-12274620929708758652008-08-30T15:31:00.000-04:002008-08-30T15:31:00.000-04:002008-08-30T15:31:00.000-04:00Hi "writeonly" -- your work looks very interesting! I'll look into this later in the weekend. --nickgnickghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04659163622120256748noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8885167082319491081.post-89257170537426354682008-08-30T15:04:00.000-04:002008-08-30T15:04:00.000-04:002008-08-30T15:04:00.000-04:00I think that PEP 265 has some relevance to your claims here. I did a few tests a well, posted at <A HREF="http://writeonly.wordpress.com/2008/08/30/sorting-dictionaries-by-value-in-python-improved/" REL="nofollow">http://writeonly.wordpress.com/2008/08/30/sorting-dictionaries-by-value-in-python-improved/</A>, and I think this is not the quickest sort by value implementation. <BR/><BR/>I hope you'll prove me wrong! <BR/><BR/>gLwriteonlyhttp://writeonly.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8885167082319491081.post-17374306196645218292008-08-28T09:11:00.000-04:002008-08-28T09:11:00.000-04:002008-08-28T09:11:00.000-04:00excellentAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8885167082319491081.post-38827764506739688452008-06-29T16:55:00.000-04:002008-06-29T16:55:00.000-04:002008-06-29T16:55:00.000-04:00Wow, this was a golden post. Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com